Thursday, August 30, 2012

Tainted Pet Treats From China And What's NOT Being Done

I often read poisonedpets.com to find out what's new in pet food, and what NOT to let my pet eat.  Chicken jerky from China has been known for years to cause death in dogs, and yet, it's still on the market.  Recently sweet potato treats were added to the list.  You should check out this web site to see how the FDA is dragging it's feet in getting tainted products off the market. 

Congressman Dennis Kucinich from Ohio made an impassioned plea to the FDA to do something to protect our pets, after years of letter writing and investigating.  Here's some of what Mr. Kucinich had to say recently.

In a press release Monday Kucinich published the following statement:

FDA Allows Pet Deaths to Mount While Awaiting Scientific Certainty

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) today released the following statement criticizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for failing to adequately protect domestic pets.
“After a weeks-long investigative trip to China and thousands of reports of sick and dying dogs, the FDA still has no answers and offers pet owners no protection,” said Kucinich.
Constituents reported illnesses in their pets after feeding them chicken jerky snacks, including ‘Waggin’ Train.’ Kucinich then wrote to the FDA demanding strong action and a briefing on their investigation. The FDA, which had known about problems with the snacks since 2008, issued a warning in November of 2011 about the instances of illnesses, but did not issue a recall.
After Kucinich demanded stronger action, the FDA sent inspectors to plants in China to investigate the conditions in which the treats were manufactured. The FDA failed to reach a conclusion, releasing their raw data with little context.
“The FDA is waiting to request a recall until it has full scientific certainty about which contaminant or chemical in chicken jerky pet treats is causing deaths of pets all over the country.
“As the FDA waits, it has to decide who pays the cost of the uncertainty. Will it be the dog treat manufacturers, who refuse to issue a recall on their own and make even more money in doing so? Or will it be beloved dogs and cats who pay with their health and their lives and whose owners receive no real warning about the danger posed by dog treats?
“By allowing the treats to stay on the market as the years-long investigation drags on, the FDA is guaranteeing more pets will die. Why?” said Kucinich.

Diagnosis: The FDA suffers from chronic constipation

Until there is a recall, the only protection consumers have is an out of date, ineffective and adequate warning system in place, leaving pet parents informed about the very real danger the treats pose, which sadly is precisely why the reports of illness and deaths of pets continues to climb. Recent accounts that there have been over 3,000 reports to the FDA* that some of the best-selling treats in America are danger to pets.
As the reports continue to escalate, the FDA has been incapable of finding the toxin responsible for causing so much anguish and pain in over 5 1/2 years. Efforts at doing so have been a haphazard, unorganized, illogical mess; the majority of which, unfortunately were tests for bacterial pathogens, are not related in any way to the cause of acute organ failure which has been primarily been responsible for illness and death of dogs associated with the pet treats.

Complications: The FDA suffers from ED, i.e.: impotency

Despite the growing number of reports, the FDA has done little to quell consumer concerns that the government is capable or even fully committed to protecting their pets. The FDA explains their inability to do so using the same, tired excuse for the products continued place on the market: they can’t recall them until they find the toxin; judging by the recent release of data of a spreadsheet outlining the testing the FDA has done since the investigation began in 2007, did little to assuage their fears or quell the growing anger and discontent with the government’s impotency.

Would the FDA react the same to a human food that was being investigated?  Absolutely not.  They would recall the product, or even take it off the market, and then investigate.  This is just another example of our impotent govenment at work, and big corporations winning. 

No comments:

Post a Comment